Mysti brings Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini into a live VS Code debate to synthesize a coherent plan from multiple AI minds across teams.
AI Team
Continue your reading
Mysti: Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini Debate and Synthesize in VS Code
Mysti is the kind of project you build to test how multiple code AIs work together in editing. The project, Show HN: Mysti: Claude, Codex, and Gemini debate your code, then synthesize, centers on a VS Code extension that orchestrates three code-focused AIs to tackle your current task.
In practice, Mysti brings Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, and Google Gemini into a single brainstorm and decision loop inside your editor. The goal isn't a single suggestion but a synthesized plan that blends the strengths of each model. The GitHub page for the project is at DeepMyst/Mysti, where the orchestration logic lives and you can read how the agents are wired together for VS Code.
Claude Code is Anthropic's code-oriented variant of Claude, designed to handle programming tasks with reasoning and safety in mind.
OpenAI Codex is the older but still widely used code model that powers many code-writing features across coding tools.
Gemini represents Google's current generation of multi-model AI from DeepMind and its partners.
Mysti pairs these three in a brainstorm mode where each agent proposes solutions, then they debate and critique each other, and finally the system synthesizes the best path forward. That synthesis aims to give you a coherent plan or concrete code approach rather than a patchwork of disparate suggestions. In short, Mysti uses multiple AI brains to reduce single-model biases and blind spots in typical code assistance.
From a technical standpoint the core idea is simple but nontrivial: you prompt three different models, collect their outputs, and then run a structured debate where each model can challenge the others. The extension then compiles the arguments, weighs the proposals, and hands you a synthesized strategy. That means more than a clever prompt; it requires careful orchestration of API calls, response normalization, and a policy for selecting the final approach.
This is the sort of multi-agent orchestration you'd expect as we move beyond single-model assistants toward collaborative reasoning in real time. The project sits squarely in VS Code, which helps developers test the concept with familiar tooling and a quick feedback loop.
There are implications for developers to watch. If Mysti matures, teams could compare architectural approaches, data structures, or algorithmic choices side by side instead of relying on a single model's recommendation.
It also raises questions about cost and latency because you are effectively running three AI models in parallel and then performing a synthesis pass.
The multi-model approach contrasts with single-model assistants like GitHub Copilot or AWS CodeWhisperer, which deliver one line or block of code based on a single underlying system. With Mysti you gain a broader viewpoint and a chance to surface alternative designs, but you also inherit the complexity and the risk of conflicting outputs that the synthesis step must reconcile.
That reconciliation is the tricky part. The debate phase can surface contradictions or overconfidence from a particular model, so the synthesis step must aim for reliable, verifiable outcomes.
This raises practical concerns teams need to manage:
That Mysti explicitly advertises a collaborative brainstorming workflow with three distinct AI systems makes these questions more immediate for teams weighing AI-assisted coding in their workflows. For context, see the official pages for the models involved: Claude, Codex, and Gemini, and the Mysti repository itself for implementation details and prompts.
Looking ahead, Mysti hints at a broader shift in how developers interact with AI assistants. The idea of an AI-powered "jury" that debates options and then synthesizes a consensus could become a pattern for key parts of software design, not just code completion.
If the approach pans out, we could see more tooling that exposes multi-model reasoning as a standard capability in editors, with configurable agent rosters and provenance trails. In the meantime, developers should treat Mysti as a lab for what happens when you push beyond single-agent guidance toward collaborative AI reasoning. It's a hint of where tooling could go, but it will rely on careful engineering, transparent prompts, and reliable validation to avoid overfitting to any one model's quirks.